That's a good idea. Chess accuracy scores are probably lower variance than the actual outcomes, but they can still be biased up or down a lot depending on the circumstances of the game, so you'd still need a sample size of many games. Open games and complex endgames tend to result in lower accuracy. Closed games and book endgames tend to result in higher accuracy.
That's a good idea. Chess accuracy scores are probably lower variance than the actual outcomes, but they can still be biased up or down a lot depending on the circumstances of the game, so you'd still need a sample size of many games. Open games and complex endgames tend to result in lower accuracy. Closed games and book endgames tend to result in higher accuracy.
That's a good idea. Chess accuracy scores are probably lower variance than the actual outcomes, but they can still be biased up or down a lot depending on the circumstances of the game, so you'd still need a sample size of many games. Open games and complex endgames tend to result in lower accuracy. Closed games and book endgames tend to result in higher accuracy.
and by higher accuracy i mean lower average centipawn loss